The Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (the Code) is a joint document between The Physiotherapy Board te Poari Tiaki Tinana o Aotearoa and Physiotherapy New Zealand Kōmiri Aotearoa (PNZ)
The Code is secondary legislation and as such must be complied with by Aotearoa New Zealand registered physiotherapists.
Several of these changes are informed by the recent Physiotherapy experiences report and the issues it raises.
To provide your feedback on the proposed changes:
- Click on the section of the Code you want to comment on to compare the current version to the proposed changes (proposed new text is in red, proposed new deletions are in
red strikethrough). - Click on the button at the end to provide your feedback on that section.
The background document for the consultation can be read here.
Preamble
Preamble
The purpose of the Aotearoa New Zealand Physiotherapy Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (Code) is to provide a foundation for the professional behaviour expected of physiotherapists in Aotearoa New Zealand. This Code is based on longstanding ethical values and professional principles of:- Respect and dignity: to acknowledge, appreciate and value the worth of an individual or group.
- Respect for autonomy: to respect the patient’s freedom to decide for him or herself, this includes informed consent.
- Beneficence: to do good or to provide benefit to patients.
- Non‐maleficence: to not cause harm to patients.
- Justice: to treat people fairly and to allocate resources fairly between patients.
- Responsibility: to be reliable and dependable.
- Trustworthiness and integrity: to be honest and able to be trusted.
- Citizenship: the standard of an individual physiotherapist’s behaviour as a member of the professional group.
Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi
The Code acknowledges Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi as a founding document of Aotearoa New Zealand, which informs legislation, policy and practice and aims to reduce the health inequalities between Māori and non‐Māori. It recognises and respects the specific importance of health services for Māori as the indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand. To practise effectively in Aotearoa New Zealand, a physiotherapist needs to understand the relevance and be able to apply the Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi principles, whilst promoting equitable opportunity for positive health outcomes within the context of Māori health (models), including whānau (family health), tinana (physical health), hinengaro (mental) and wairua (spiritual health). Relevant resources: Physiotherapy Standards 2018, the Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). (Key features, cultural competence, pp.11, 12)Relationships with other codes and legislation
Under section 118(i) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (HPCAA), the Physiotherapy Board is responsible for setting standards of clinical competence, cultural competence and ethical conduct for physiotherapists. This Code has been developed to be such a standard and as the foundation document for other standards. This Code should be read in conjunction with relevant legislation and case law in Aotearoa New Zealand and with policies, procedures, thresholds, competencies, and standards that regulate professional practice. While relevant law has been identified throughout the Code wherever possible, the Code is not a substitute for and does not address in detail, the full range of legal obligations that apply to physiotherapists, such as, for example, those under privacy, child protection, employment and health and safety legislation. It is important that all physiotherapists have a full understanding of and comply with all laws and regulations that govern the practice of physiotherapy in Aotearoa New Zealand. Where there is any conflict between the Code and the law, the law takes precedence.Terminology
Physiotherapists must: The term ‘must’ is used where the statement sets a minimum standard that all physiotherapists are obliged to achieve. Physiotherapists should: The term ‘should’ indicates that the physiotherapist may use their discretion. A statement marked as ‘should’ and not ‘must’ recognises that in some contexts and situations the physiotherapist requires a degree of flexibility in their response. Guidance is offered by the ‘should’ statement, but it is up to the individual physiotherapist to decide, and be able to justify, using their professional judgement and/or seeking advice from experienced colleagues. Patient: The term ‘patient’ may be substituted with the term ‘client’ where appropriate. A Glossary of Terms is set out in Appendix 1.Aotearoa New Zealand Physiotherapy Code of Ethics and professional conduct with commentary
The commentary appended throughout is intended to provide helpful interpretation of the principles involved. In some instances, it is illustrative rather than exhaustive. Physiotherapists should apply the following principles where specific situations are not covered in the commentary.Breach of Code
This Code will be used by the Physiotherapy Board as a standard by which a physiotherapist’s conduct is measured. The Code may also be used by the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal (HPDT), the Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC), the Ministry of Health and the courts as a standard by which a physiotherapist’s conduct is measured. A failure by a physiotherapist to comply with this Code may result in, as appropriate:- A referral to a Professional Conduct Committee, if one or more questions about the appropriateness of the conduct or safety of the practice of a physiotherapist have been raised, pursuant to section 68(3) of the HPCAA
- A Professional Conduct Committee laying a charge before the HPDT
- A competence review pursuant to section 36(4) of the HPCAA
- A referral to the HDC
- A referral to the Ministry of Health Enforcement unit
- Such other action as the Physiotherapy Board may deem appropriate in the circumstances.
Principles
- Physiotherapists respect the patient and their whānau and families.
- Physiotherapists act to promote the health and wellbeing of the patient while acknowledging, respecting, and facilitating patient autonomy.
- Physiotherapists respect confidentiality, privacy, and security of patient information.
- Physiotherapists treat people fairly.
- Physiotherapists practice in a safe, competent and accountable manner.
- Physiotherapists act with integrity in all professional activities.
- Physiotherapists strive for excellence in the practice of physiotherapy.
- Physiotherapists communicate effectively and cooperate with colleagues, other health professionals and agencies, for the benefit of their patients and the wider community.
- Physiotherapists take responsibility for maintaining their own health and wellbeing.
- Physiotherapists accept responsibility for upholding the integrity of the profession.
Preamble
This Code is secondary legislation made by the Physiotherapy Board under section 118(1)(i) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003.
The purpose of the Aotearoa New Zealand Physiotherapy Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (Code) is to provide a foundation for the professional behaviour expected of physiotherapists in Aotearoa New Zealand. This Code is based on longstanding ethical values and professional principles (See Appendix 1)
Note: values and professional principles moved to appendix 1
The principles expressed in this document reflect the values considered fundamental to the practice of physiotherapy in Aotearoa New Zealand. The aim of the Code is to cover areas of ethical concern most commonly experienced by physiotherapists. It is not intended to address all ethical concerns, nor provide solutions to all ethical problems. Physiotherapists are expected to exercise their ethical judgement and balance ethical values.
The Code acknowledges the many areas of clinical work and other work environments of physiotherapists in Aotearoa New Zealand that may include, but is not limited to, a hospital or residential aged care facility, private practice, community‐based, educational facility, government agencies, industry, tertiary educational institutions, sports environment, telehealth, and military.
The Code also recognises that physiotherapists may act in the role of first contact practitioner, or in response to referrals from others.
Te Tiriti o Waitangi /Treaty of Waitangi
The Code acknowledges Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi as a founding document of Aotearoa New Zealand, and respects Māori as tangata whenua. The Code integrates the articles and overarching Principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi are integral which informs legislation, policy and practice. and with the aim to improve health equity between Māori and Tauiwi.aims to reduce the health inequalities between Māori and non‐Māori. It recognises and respects the specific importance of health services for Māori as the indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand.
To practise effectively in Aotearoa New Zealand, a physiotherapist needs to understand the relevance of and be able to apply the Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi principles, while promoting equitable opportunity for positive health outcomes within the context of Māori health (models), including whānau (family health), tinana (physical health), hinengaro (mental) and wairua (spiritual health).
Relationships with other codes and legislation
Under section 118(1)(i) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, the Physiotherapy Board is responsible for setting standards of clinical competence, cultural competence (including competencies that will enable effective and respectful interaction with Māori), and ethical conduct to be observed by of clinical competence, cultural competence and ethical conduct for physiotherapists. This Code has been developed to be such a standard and as the foundation document for other standards.
This Code should be read in conjunction with relevant legislation and case law in Aotearoa New Zealand and with policies, procedures, thresholds, competencies, and standards that regulate physiotherapy professional practice.
While relevant law has been identified throughout the Code wherever possible, the Code is not a substitute for, and does not address in detail, the full range of legal obligations that apply to physiotherapists, such as, those under privacy, child protection, the Health and Disability Code, employment and health and safety legislation. It is important that all physiotherapists have an full appropriate understanding of and comply with all laws and regulations that govern the practice of physiotherapy in Aotearoa New Zealand. Where there is any conflict between the Code and the law, the law takes precedence.
Terminology
Physiotherapists must:
The term ‘must’ is used where the statement sets a minimum standard that all physiotherapists are obliged to achieve.
Physiotherapists should:
The term ‘should’ indicates that the physiotherapist may use their discretion. A statement marked as ‘should’ and not ‘must’ recognises that in some contexts and situations the physiotherapist requires a degree of flexibility in their response. Guidance is offered by the ‘should’ statement, but it is up to the individual physiotherapist to decide, and be able to justify, by using their professional judgement and/or seeking advice from experienced colleagues.
Patient:
The term ‘patient’ may be substituted with the term ‘client’ where appropriate.
A Glossary of Terms is set out in Appendix 12.
Aotearoa New Zealand Physiotherapy Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct with commentary
The commentary appended throughout is intended to provide helpful interpretation of the principles involved. In some instances, it is illustrative rather than exhaustive.
Physiotherapists should apply the following principles where specific situations are not covered in the commentary and seek guidance from the Board te Poari if required.
Breach of Code
This Code will be used by the Physiotherapy Board as a yardstick standard by which a physiotherapist’s conduct is measured. The Code may also be used by the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal (HPDT), the Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC), the Ministry of Health and the courts as a standard by which a physiotherapist’s conduct is measured.
A failure by a physiotherapist to comply with this Code may result in, as appropriate:
- a referral to a Professional Conduct Committee, if one or more questions about the appropriateness of the conduct or safety of the practice of a physiotherapist have been raised, pursuant to section 68(1) of the HPCAA
- A Professional Conduct Committee laying a charge before the HPDT
- A competence review pursuant to section 36(4) of the HPCAA
- A referral to the Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC)
- A referral to the Ministry of Health Enforcement Unit
- Such other action as the Physiotherapy Board may deem appropriate in the circumstances.
Principles
- Physiotherapists respect kiritaki and their whānau and families.
- Physiotherapists act to promote the health and wellbeing of the
patientkiritaki while acknowledging, respecting, and facilitatingpatientkiritaki autonomy. - Physiotherapists protect
respectconfidentiality, privacy, and security ofpatientkiritaki information. - Physiotherapists treat people fairly.
- Physiotherapists practice in a safe, competent and accountable manner.
- Physiotherapists act with integrity in all professional activities.
- Physiotherapists strive for continual improvement
excellencein the practice of physiotherapy. - Physiotherapists communicate effectively and collaborate
cooperatewith colleagues, and other health professionals and agencies, for the benefit of theirpatientkiritaki and the wider community. - Physiotherapists take responsibility for maintaining their own health and wellbeing.
- Physiotherapists accept responsibility for upholding the integrity of the profession.
Amendments to Preamble
Values and Professional Principles moved to appendix 1
Updates to Te Tiriti o Waitangi section
Update to the wording of Section 118(1) (i)a
1. Physiotherapists respect the patient and their whānau and families
1. Physiotherapists respect the patient and their whānau and families
The relationship between physiotherapist and their patient is one of trust, and as such physiotherapists must:
1.1 respect the dignity, privacy, bodily integrity, and mental wellbeing of patients.
1.2 conduct themselves in a respectful manner towards the patient as well as their whānau, family and carers
1.3 practise with due care and respect for a patient’s culture, needs, values, worldviews and beliefs, including Te Ao Māori.
1.4 not impose their own values and beliefs on patients or their whānau and family.
Relevant law; Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Rights 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Relevant resources;
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015) Principle 1; 1.3; 1.4; 2.2B; 4.1C; 5.1.
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Cultural competence standard
1. Physiotherapists respect the patientkiritaki and their whānau and families.
The relationship between physiotherapist and their patientkiritaki is one of trust, and as such physiotherapists must:
1.1 respect the dignity, privacy, bodily integrity, and mental wellbeing of patientkiritaki.
1.2 conduct themselves respectfully mannertowards the patientkiritaki as well as their whānau, family and carerssupport persons.
1.3 practise with due care and respect for patientkiritaki culture, identity, needs, values, lived experience worldviews and beliefs: including Te Ao Māori.
1.4 not impose their own identity, values and beliefs on patientkiritaki or their whānau and family.
Amendments to Principle 1:
1.1 Comma removed between bodily integrity and mental wellbeing to better reflect they are not separate
1.2 ‘carers’ amended to ‘support persons’
1.3 Amended to include Physiotherapists experience and identity. ‘Including Te Ao Māori’ removed as ‘culture, identity, needs, values, lived experiences and beliefs’ encompasses and includes Te Ao Māori
1.4 Addition of identity
General feedback – 95% of respondents believe Principle 1 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand.
2. Physiotherapists act to promote the health and wellbeing of the patient while acknowledging, respecting, and facilitating patient autonomy
2. Physiotherapists act to promote the health and wellbeing of the patient while acknowledging, respecting, and facilitating patient autonomy
Physiotherapists must:
2.1 consider the health and wellbeing of the patient to be their first priority.
2.2 respect the autonomy and freedom of choice of the patient.
Commentary: Physiotherapists must respect the freedom of the patient to choose their physiotherapist (where practicable) or to refuse physiotherapy treatment (even if in doing so that would harm them). The patient is also entitled to seek a second opinion, and physiotherapists should assist this process. For autonomy of children or the adult patient with diminished decision‐making capacity, see section 2.7 of this Code.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Rights 5, 6 and 7.
2.3 establish respectful partnerships with patients that acknowledge patient needs and goals.
Commentary: These partnerships may include the patient’s whānau and family if that accords with patient needs, values and wishes.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Rights 1, 4 and 8.
2.4 involve the patient in planning care, and revisit patient goals and plans on a regular basis.
2.5 clearly and adequately inform patients of the purpose and nature of the physiotherapy intervention to enable all patients to make an informed choice.
Commentary: The patient is entitled to information about his or her diagnosis and prognosis, care plan, alternative treatments, risks and benefits associated with treatment, costs associated with treatment, results of any tests, and the name of the physiotherapist providing care and any other relevant information. This information must be provided in a form, language and manner that can be understood by the patient. The patient must be given the time and opportunity to ask questions and have them answered to their satisfaction. Where necessary and practicable, an interpreter must be supplied. The physiotherapist should be guided by the patient in ascertaining whether additional information is required to enable the patient to make an informed choice and give informed consent.
Relevant law; Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Rights 5, 6 and 7.
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Informed consent standard
2.6 seek patient consent prior to providing physiotherapy services, ensuring that patient consent is freely given and appropriately documented.
Commentary: For most physiotherapy procedures verbal consent is usually sufficient (however this should be documented in patient records). Written consent is required in many cases including where there is significant risk of adverse effects, a student is involved, experimental procedures, or when the patient is involved in research. Written consent is not necessarily a safeguard for the physiotherapist if the process of informed consent has not been fulfilled. Getting patients to sign a non‐specific consent to any future proposed treatment is not acceptable. Consent must be obtained for every new treatment, or when the patient’s circumstances change. Consent should be considered an ongoing conversation between the physiotherapist and the patient and should be obtained prior to each interaction. Physiotherapists should be alert to the possibility that a patient may wish to withdraw consent to ongoing or future treatment and this must be respected.
If the patient refuses treatment, this must be documented in the patient record together with the information provided to the patient. If the patient was referred by another practitioner, the referring practitioner should be informed of the refusal.
Relevant law; Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Right 5, 6 & 7; New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 11.
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Informed consent standard
2.7 act in accordance with the law where the patient has compromised decision‐making capacity, or is unable to provide informed consent.
Commentary: There are times when a patient is unable to give or refuse informed consent due to compromised decision‐making capacity. The patient with diminished decision‐making capacity has the right to make informed choices and give informed consent to the level of their understanding. Whether or not a patient can give or refuse consent to treatment depends on whether the person is able to understand the treatment decision that they are being asked to make.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Right 7.
In emergency situations where treatment is necessary to save a patient’s life, or to prevent harm to the patient, and the patient’s wishes are not known, the professional is expected to act in the patient’s best interests (which may include, for example, providing resuscitation).
Relevant law: Doctrine of necessity in the common law.
If there is no emergency, but the patient is unable to consent, the physiotherapist should seek informed consent from a person who is legally entitled to consent on behalf of the patient, if there is such a person.
In the case of a child under the age of 18, the child’s parent or guardian is normally entitled to consent on behalf of the child. However, s 36 Care of Children Act 2004 states that children aged 16 or 17 years old are deemed to have the same decision‐making capacity as adults to consent or refuse consent to treatment for their benefit. A child below the age of 16 who has sufficient knowledge and understanding of the nature, risks and benefits of the particular treatment is also competent to consent or refuse consent to the treatment. This test, known as the Gillick decision‐making capacity (or competency) test, requires an individual assessment of the capacity of the child in relation to the particular decision for which the consent is required. Where a child is not competent to consent (and/or a parent or guardian has consented on the child’s behalf), the child’s assent should be sought and documented. Not only does this show respect to the child patient, but it is also more likely to ensure the child’s participation in the treatment.
An adult patient who does not have decision‐making capacity (and is therefore incompetent) may have executed an Enduring Power of Attorney for Personal Care and Welfare prior to becoming incompetent authorising someone else to make decisions on behalf of the patient. Alternatively, the court may have appointed a welfare guardian to provide informed consent. The patient may also have made an Advance Directive, which may be relevant to care.
If an incompetent adult patient has no welfare guardian or Enduring Power of Attorney for Personal Care and Welfare authorising someone to consent on behalf of the patient, the physiotherapist must act in the patient’s best interests having taken reasonable steps to ascertain the views of the patient, for example by consulting with the whānau and family. The purpose of this consultation is not to seek consent from the family but to determine what choice the patient would make if he or she were competent. If the patient’s views cannot be ascertained, the physiotherapist must act in the best interests of the patient, taking into account the views of suitable persons who are available and interested in the welfare of the patient.
Relevant law: Care of Children Act 2004 s 36; Great Britain. (1984). Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. The all England law reports, 1985(1), 533. Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988, Protection of Personal and Property Rights Amendment Act 2007, Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Right 6 & 7.
Physiotherapy Standard (2018): Informed consent
2.8 seek patient consent if a physiotherapy student (or other person) will be present during the provision of physiotherapy services or providing aspects of care.
Commentary: If an additional person is present and is to be involved in the assessment and/or treatment of a patient, prior consent must be obtained by the physiotherapist in charge of the patient’s treatment. Examples of the additional person is a support person, chaperone, observer, interpreter, a student or other health professional involved in training, a Board or registrar appointed supervisor or competence reviewer. Consent must be sought without the student/other person present to allow for freely given consent. The supervising physiotherapist must be cautious and diligent when considering the involvement of a physiotherapy student or another person. The supervising physiotherapist plays an important role in maintaining professional standards in relation to the assessment and treatment, and continues to owe a duty of care to the patient.
Patients must be informed that they may, at any time, withdraw their consent to being treated by a physiotherapy student (or another person).
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Rights 6, 7 and 9.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy Standards (2018): Informed consent standard, Involvement of an additional person during a consultation standard.
Physiotherapy New Zealand Position Statement (2012): When another person is present during a consultation
2.9 not exploit any patient physically, sexually, emotionally, or financially. Sexual contact of any kind with patients is unacceptable, and in nearly all instances sexual contact with former patients would be regarded as unethical.
Commentary: It is acknowledged that in some instances the former patient– physiotherapist professional relationship may have been brief, minor in nature, or in the distant past. In such circumstances and where a sexual relationship has developed from social contact away from the professional environment, impropriety would not necessarily be inferred.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Right 2 & 4.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015) 2.1G, 2.1J.
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Sexual and emotional boundaries standard,
Physiotherapy New Zealand Position Statement (2012): Clear sexual boundaries in the patient – physiotherapist relationship: a guide for physiotherapists/guide for patients
2.10 establish and maintain appropriate professional boundaries with students under their supervision.
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Sexual and emotional boundaries standard
2.11 establish and maintain appropriate professional boundaries with patients and their whānau and families.
Commentary: Society trusts physiotherapists to act in the best interest of patients. A power imbalance exists within the therapeutic relationship that can easily lead to exploitation or abuse if trust is not respected. Professional boundaries describe the limits to the relationship that a physiotherapist should observe when treating patients and their whānau and family.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Rights 1, 2 and 4.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Sexual and emotional boundaries standard.
Physiotherapy New Zealand Position Statement (2012): Clear sexual boundaries in the patient – physiotherapist relationship: a guide for physiotherapists/guide for patients
2.12 make provision for continuity of care when closing or relocating a place of practice, or otherwise planning to be absent from their place of practice.
Commentary: A written record of the transfer of care together with any notes on the patient’s ongoing care and treatment should be provided to the replacing physiotherapist or other healthcare provider in a timely manner.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Right 4; Health Information Privacy Code 2020
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Physiotherapy health records standard
Physiotherapists should:
2.13 consider and, where practicable, advocate for the health needs of the community within which they practise.
Commentary: Physiotherapists may become aware of health needs that go beyond the individual patient and may affect the wider community and require a broader‐based intervention.
2.14 be alert to the needs and special concerns of vulnerable groups. Where there are concerns that patients or others may be subject to abuse physiotherapists should consider their legal and ethical obligations.
Commentary: Children, the elderly and the disabled may be particularly vulnerable to physical, sexual or emotional abuse. Where a physiotherapist suspects that a patient is being abused, they should be guided by relevant policies and procedures of their employer. In the absence of such guidance, the physiotherapist should seek advice from health providers with expertise in dealing with abuse.
Special consideration must be given to Tamariki/children in terms of sharing of information about family violence [and when] you should report a concern to the Police or Oranga Tamariki if you are worried or concerned that Tamariki/children could be, or are being harmed; illtreated; abused; neglected or deprived in any way or you have concerns about their well‐being.
Under the Family Violence Act 2018 you must consider sharing information if you receive a request from another agency or practitioner in the sector if you believe hat it may protect a victim from family violence.
Physiotherapists should consult relevant professionals prior to disclosing a suspected abuse of
adult patients (useful resources are listed below).
Relevant law: Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 sections 15 and 16, Privacy Act 2020, Health Information Privacy Code 2020, Family Violence Act 2018, Vulnerable Children Act 2014.
Relevant resources:
Ministry of Health’s ‘Family Violence Assessment and Intervention Guidelines: Child abuse and intimate partner violence’ (June 2016), ‘Family Intervention Guidelines: Elder abuse and neglect’ (August 2007).
Physiotherapy New Zealand Guideline (2016): Vulnerable children act and health worker safety checks
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015) 1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 1.4, 2.1; 3.1; 5.1; 6.1F.
2. Physiotherapists act to promote the health and wellbeing of the patientkiritaki while acknowledging, respecting, and facilitating patientkiritaki autonomy.
Physiotherapists must:
2.1 consider the health and wellbeing of the patientkiritaki to be their first priority.
2.2 respect the autonomy and freedom of choice of the patientkiritaki by involving themkiritaki in the planning and delivery of care.
Commentary: Physiotherapists must respect the freedom of the patientkiritaki to choose their physiotherapist (where practicable) or to refuse physiotherapy treatment (even if in doing so that would harm them). The patientkiritaki is also entitled to seek a second opinion, and physiotherapists should assist this process. For autonomy of children or the adult patientkiritaki with diminished decision‐making capacity, see section 2.7 of this Code.
2.22.3 establish collaborative and respectful relationshipspartnerships with patientkiritaki that acknowledge patienttheir needs and goals.
Commentary: These relationshipspartnerships may include the patientkiritaki whānau and family if that accords with patientkiritaki needs, values and wishes.
involve the patientkiritaki in planning care, and revisit patientkiritaki goals and plans on a regular basis.
2.4 clearly and adequately inform patientkiritaki of the purpose and nature of the physiotherapy serviceintervention to enable all thempatients to make an informed choice, ensuring informed consent is freely given and appropriately documented.
Commentary: The patientkiritaki is entitled to information about their diagnosis and prognosis, care plan, alternative treatments, risks and benefits associated with treatment, costs associated with treatment, results of any tests, and the name of the physiotherapist providing care and any other relevant information. This information must be provided in a form, language and manner that can be understood by the patientkiritaki. The patientkiritaki must be given the time and opportunity to ask questions and have them answered to their satisfaction. Where necessary and practicable, an interpreter must be supplied. The physiotherapist should be guided by the patientkiritaki in ascertaining whether additional information is required to enable the patientkiritaki to make an informed choice and give informed consent.
2.3 seek patient consent prior to providing physiotherapy services, ensuring that patient consent is freely given and appropriately documented.
Commentary: For most physiotherapy procedures verbal consent is usually sufficient (however this should be documented in patientkiritaki records). Written consent is required in many cases including where there is significant risk of adverse effects, a student is involved, experimental procedures, or when the patientkiritaki is involved in research. Written consent is not necessarily a safeguard for the physiotherapist if the process of informed consent has not been fulfilled. Getting patientkiritaki to sign a non‐specific consent to any future proposed treatment is not acceptable. Consent must be
obtained for every new treatment, or when the patientkiritakii circumstances change. Consent should be considered an ongoing conversation between the physiotherapist and the patientkiritakii and should be obtained prior to each interaction. Physiotherapists should be alert to the possibility that a patientkiritaki may wish to withdraw consent to ongoing or future treatment and this must be respected.
If the patientkiritaki refuses treatment, this must be documented in the patienttheir record together with the information provided to them patient. If the patientkiritaki was referred by another practitioner, the referring practitioner should be informed of the refusal.
2.42.5 act in accordance with the law where the patientkiritaki has compromised decision‐making capacity, or is unable to provide informed consent.
Commentary: There are times when a patientkiritaki is unable to give or refuse informed consent due to compromised decision‐making capacity. The patientkiritaki with diminished decision‐making capacity has the right to make informed choices and give informed consent to the level of their understanding. Whether or not a patientkiritaki can give or refuse consent to treatment depends on whether the person is able to understand the treatment decision that they are being asked to make.
In emergency situations where treatment is necessary to save a patientkiritaki life, or to prevent harm to the patientkiritaki, and the patientkiritaki wishes are not known, the professional is expected to act in the patientkiritaki best interests of the kiritaki (which may include, for example, providing resuscitation).
If there is no emergency, but the patient is unable to consent, the physiotherapist should seek informed consent from a person who is legally entitled to consent on behalf of the patient, if there is such a person.
In the case of a child under the age of 18, the child’s parent or guardian is normally entitled to consent on behalf of the child. However, s 36 Care of Children Act 2004 states that children aged 16 or 17 years old are deemed to have the same decision‐making capacity as adults to consent or refuse consent to treatment for their benefit. A child below the age of 16 who has sufficient knowledge and understanding of the nature, risks and benefits of the particular treatment is also competent to consent or refuse consent to the treatment. This test, known as the Gillick decision‐ making capacity (or competency) test, requires an individual assessment of the capacity of the child in relation to the particular decision for which the consent is required. Where a child is not competent to consent (and/or a parent or guardian has consented on the child’s behalf), the child’s assent should be sought and documented. Not only does this show respect to the child patient, but it is also more likely to ensure the child’s participation in the treatment.
An adult patient who does not have decision‐making capacity (and is therefore incompetent) may have executed an Enduring Power of Attorney for Personal Care and Welfare prior to becoming incompetent authorising someone else to make decisions on behalf of the patientkiritaki. Alternatively, the court may have appointed a welfare guardian to provide informed consent. The patient may also have made an Advance Directive, which may be relevant to care.
If an incompetent adult patient has no welfare guardian or Enduring Power of Attorney for Personal Care and Welfare authorising someone to consent on behalf of the patient, the physiotherapist must act in the patient’s best interests having taken reasonable steps to ascertain the views of the patient, for example by consulting with the whānau and family. The purpose of this consultation is not to seek consent from the family but to determine what choice the patient would make if he or she were competent. If the patient’s views cannot be ascertained, the physiotherapist must act in the best interests of the patient, taking into account the views of suitable persons who are available and interested in the welfare of the patient.
2.52.6 seek patientkiritaki consent if a physiotherapy student (or other person) will be present during the provision of physiotherapy services or providing aspects of care.
Commentary: If an additional person is present and is to be involved in the assessment and/or treatment of a patient, prior consent must be obtained by the physiotherapist in charge of the patient’s treatment. Examples of the additional person is a support person, chaperone, observer, interpreter, a student or other health professional involved in training, a Board or registrar appointed supervisor or competence reviewer. Consent must be sought without the student/other person present to allow for freely given consent. The supervising physiotherapist must be cautious and diligent when considering the involvement of a physiotherapy student or another person.
The supervising physiotherapist plays an important role in maintaining professional standards in relation to the assessment and treatment, and continues to owe a duty of care to the patient.
Patients must be informed that they may, at any time, withdraw their consent to being treated by a physiotherapy student (or another person).
2.62.7 not exploit any patientkiritaki physically, sexually, emotionally, or financially. Sexual contact of any kind with patientkiritaki is unacceptable, and in nearly all instances sexual contact with former patientkiritaki would be regarded as unethical.
Commentary: It is acknowledged that in some instances the former patientphysiotherapist‐kiritaki professional relationship may have been brief, minor in nature, or in the distant past. In such circumstances and where a sexual relationship has developed from social contact away from the professional environment, impropriety would not necessarily be inferred.
2.72.8 establish and maintain appropriate professional boundaries with students under their supervision, and recognise there is a power imbalance.
Commentary: Physiotherapists must understand that a power imbalance exists with students under their supervision and recognise a sexual or emotional (or otherwise inappropriate) relationship is never acceptable with a student under a physiotherapist’s direct supervision. (Professional boundaries standard)
2.82.9 establish and maintain appropriate professional boundaries with patientkiritaki and their whānau and families.
Commentary: Society trusts physiotherapists to act in the best interest of patientkiritaki. A power imbalance exists within the therapeutic relationship that can easily lead to exploitation or abuse if trust is not respected. Professional boundaries describe the limits to the relationship that a physiotherapist should observe when treating patientkiritaki and their whānau and family.
2.92.10 make provision for continuity of care when closing or relocating a place of practice, or otherwise planning to be absent from their place of practice.
Commentary: A written record of the transfer of care together with any notes on the patientkiritaki ongoing care and treatment should be provided to the replacing physiotherapist or other healthcare provider in a timely manner.
2.102.11 Where there are concerns that patientkiritaki or others may be subject to abuse, physiotherapists should consider their legal and ethical obligations.
Commentary: Children, the elderly and the disabled may be particularly vulnerable to physical, sexual or emotional abuse. Where a physiotherapist suspects that a patientkiritaki is being abused, they should be guided by relevant policies and procedures of their employer. In the absence of such guidance, the physiotherapist should seek advice from health providers with expertise in dealing with abuse.
2.112.12 be alert to the needs and special concerns of vulnerable kiritaki and groups within the context of physiotherapy services.
Physiotherapists should:
2.122.13 consider and, where practicable, advocate for the health needs of the community within which they practise.
Commentary: Physiotherapists may become aware of health needs that go beyond the individual patientkiritaki and may affect the wider community and require a broader‐based intervention.
Special consideration must be given to Tamariki/children in terms of sharing of information about family violence [and when] you should report a concern to the Police or Oranga Tamariki if you are worried or concerned that Tamariki/children could be, or are being harmed; illtreated; abused; neglected or deprived in any way or you have concerns about their well‐being.
Under the Family Violence Act 2018 you must consider sharing information if you receive a request from another agency or practitioner in the sector if you believe hat it may protect a victim from family violence.
Physiotherapists should consult relevant professionals prior to disclosing a suspected abuse of adult patientkiritaki (useful resources are listed below).
Amendments to Principle 2:
General: definition of ‘exploit’ added to glossary
2.1 No changes
2.2 Merged with 2.4
2.3 ‘collaborative’ added. ‘Relationships’ replaces ‘partnerships’
2.4 Merged with 2.2
2.5 ‘service’ replaces ‘intervention’ and addition of ‘ensuring informed consent is freely given and appropriately documented.’
2.6 Merged with 2.5
2.7 No change
2.8 No change
2.9 Definition of ‘exploit’ added to the glossary.
2.10 Addition of ‘and recognise there is a power imbalance’
2.11 No change
2.12 No change
2.13 Expand commentary to include explanation of ‘advocacy’
2.14 Split into two separate points to reflect to different issues
General feedback – 96% of respondents believe Principle 2 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
3. Physiotherapists respect confidentiality, privacy and security of patient information
3. Physiotherapists respect confidentiality, privacy and security of patient information.
Physiotherapists must:
3.1 hold all patient information in confidence (including when the patient has ended treatment).
Commentary: Trust is important in the physiotherapy‐patient relationship, and maintaining confidentiality is central to that trust. It is expected that physiotherapists respect the confidentiality, privacy, and security of patient information. However, the duty of confidentiality is subject to exceptions outlined below.
3.2 not disclose identifiable personal or health information about a patient without the patient’s permission, unless disclosure is required or permitted by law.
Commentary: The general rule is that identifiable personal or health information must not be disclosed without patient consent.
There are very limited situations when identifiable patient information must be disclosed even though the patient may not have given consent. The most common example is on request for health information from another healthcare provider who is to provide care for the patient. There is also a requirement to disclose health information to a parent or guardian or the personal representative of a deceased patient on their request. Such requests are made under s 22F Health Act 1956 and may be declined if the physiotherapist has reasonable grounds for believing that the patient would not want the information disclosed or if disclosure would be contrary to the patient’s interests.
In some circumstances, personal or health information may be disclosed without patient consent and even against the patient’s wishes (e.g. when the patient poses a serious threat to themselves or someone else).
Sharing relevant health information is permitted when transferring care between healthcare providers. That may include sharing health information with the patient’s caregiver such as a whānau or family member. Sharing non‐identifiable health information for purposes of education, professional/clinical supervision, or consultation with others about appropriate treatment is also permitted. However, in these circumstances, care must be taken to prevent people being inadvertently identified.
The Oranga Tamariki Act provisions support sharing information between professionals other than the Police and Oranga Tamariki.
When a physiotherapist receives a request made under s.66 of the Oranga Tamariki Act by a representative from the Police or Oranga Tamariki for information relating to the safety or well‐being of a child or young person, the physiotherapist must release the information. However, before releasing the information the physiotherapist should confirm that it is requested by a representative from either the Police or Oranga Tamariki and the request is about a person who is under 18 years.
In the case of requests made under s.66A of the Oranga Tamariki Act, or under s.20 of the Family Violence Act, the physiotherapist must consider providing the information requested. The information recorded in the physiotherapist’s clinical records should show that this consideration has been given.
There are a number of other provisions in legislation under which information can be requested from, and supplied by, a physiotherapist. The bodies which make such requests should make it clear what statutory authority they are relying on. A physiotherapist can and should ask the requesting body to clarify in writing exactly what information is sought, the reason for the request, and the statutory provision which might permit or require the physiotherapist to provide that information.
Relevant law: Privacy Act 2020, Health Information Privacy Code 2020 Rule 11, Health Act 1956 section 22F, Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996 Right 4, Family Violence Act 2018, Oranga Tamariki Act 1989.
Relevant resources:
Overview of the Family Violence Act 2018, information sharing provisions
3.3 ensure that all patient records and images are stored securely.
Commentary: Patient records must be retained and disposed of in accordance with the law.
If photographs or other images of the patient were taken for clinical reasons, specific consent must be sought if those photographs or images are to be used for advertising, promotion or academic purposes.
Relevant law: Privacy Act 2020, Health Information Privacy Code 2020 Rule 5, Health (Retention of Health Information) Regulations 1996.
3.4 not access patient information unless the physiotherapist is involved in that patient’s care or has specific permission to do so from the patient or the patient’s legal guardian.
Commentary: Only those people authorised to do so should access patient records, and access must only be made when necessary for providing care.
Relevant law: Privacy Act 2020, Health Information Privacy Code 2020 Rule 10.
Relevant resources: Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015) 2.1E; 2.1I,
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Physiotherapy health records standard
3. Physiotherapists protectrespect confidentiality, privacy and security of patientkiritaki information.
Physiotherapists must:
3.1 protect kiritaki information, hold it in confidence, and not disclose identifiable personal or health information without their recorded permission, or unless if legally disclosure is required or permitted. by lawhold all patientkiritaki information in confidence (including when the patientkiritaki has ended treatment).
Commentary: Trust is important in the physiotherapy‐patientkiritaki relationship, and maintaining confidentiality is central to that trust. It is expected that physiotherapists respect the confidentiality, privacy, and security of patientkiritaki information. However, the duty of confidentiality is subject to exceptions outlined below.
3.2 not disclose identifiable personal or health information about a patientkiritaki without the patientkiritaki permission, unless disclosure is required or permitted by law.
Commentary: The general rule is that identifiable personal or health information must not be disclosed without patientkiritaki consent.
There are very limited situations when identifiable patientkiritaki information must be disclosed even though the patientkiritaki may not have given consent. The most common example is on request for health information from another healthcare provider who is to provide care for the patientkiritaki. There is also a requirement to disclose health information to a parent or guardian or the personal representative of a deceased patientkiritaki on their request. Such requests are made under s 22F Health Act 1956 and may be declined if the physiotherapist has reasonable grounds for believing that the patientkiritaki would not want the information disclosed or if disclosure would be contrary to the patientkiritaki’s interests.
In some circumstances, personal or health information may be disclosed without patientkiritaki consent and even against the patientkiritaki’s wishes (e.g. when the patientkiritaki poses a serious threat to themselves or someone else).
Sharing relevant health information is permitted when transferring care between healthcare providers. That may include sharing health information with the patientkiritaki’s caregiver such as a whānau or family member. Sharing non‐identifiable health information for purposes of education, professional/clinical supervision, or consultation with others about appropriate treatment is also permitted. However, in these circumstances, care must be taken to prevent people being inadvertently identified.
The Oranga Tamariki Act provisions support sharing information between professionals other than the Police and Oranga Tamariki.
When a physiotherapist receives a request made under s.66 of the Oranga Tamariki Act by a representative from the Police or Oranga Tamariki for information relating to the safety or well‐ being of a child or young person, the physiotherapist must release the information. However, before releasing the information the physiotherapist should confirm that it is requested by a representative from either the Police or Oranga Tamariki and the request is about a person who is under 18 years.
In the case of requests made under s.66A of the Oranga Tamariki Act, or under s.20 of the Family Violence Act, the physiotherapist must consider providing the information requested. The information recorded in the physiotherapist’s clinical records should show that this consideration has been given.
There are a number of other provisions in legislation under which information can be requested from, and supplied by, a physiotherapist. The bodies which make such requests should make it clear what statutory authority they are relying on. A physiotherapist can and should ask the requesting body to clarify in writing exactly what information is sought, the reason for the request, and the statutory provision which might permit or require the physiotherapist to provide that information.
3.33.2 ensure that all kiritaki information, records and images are stored securely.
Commentary: PatientKiritaki records must be retained and disposed of in accordance with the law.
If photographs or other images of the patientkiritaki were taken for clinical reasons, specific consent must be sought if those photographs or images are to be used for advertising, promotion or academic purposes.
3.3 onlynot access patientkiritaki information, records and/or images unless thewhen the physiotherapist is involved in that patientkiritaki treating physiotherapist has a lawfullegitimate reason to do so or has specific permission to do so from the patientkiritaki or the legal guardian of the patientkiritaki .
Commentary: Only those people authorised to do so should access patientkiritaki records, and access must only be made when necessary for providing care.
Amendments to Principle 3:
Statement amended from ‘respect’ to ‘protect’
3.1 amended to better reflect privacy legislation and merged with 3.2
3.2 merged with 3.1
3.3 addition of ‘information’ to encompass all that is collected.
3.4 amended into a positive statement and widened to include all legitimate reason.
General feedback – 99% of respondents believe Principle 3 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
4. Physiotherapists treat people fairly
4. Physiotherapists treat people fairly
Physiotherapists must:
4.1 not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, political affiliation, economic, social or health status or any other legally prohibited grounds of discrimination.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996 Right 2, Human Rights Act 1993 Part 2. Physiotherapy standard (2018): Cultural competence standard
4.2 use a coherent, robust and transparent rationale when allocating resources.
Commentary: When a physiotherapist is deciding which patients should get access to resources before others, it is important to use a rationale that is reasonable and acceptable. For example, prioritising one person over another on the basis of personal friendship or because one person is considered to be a ‘better’ person is not acceptable.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996 Rights 2, 3 and 4.
4.3 be responsible stewards of healthcare resources.
Commentary: Within the level of their role, physiotherapists need to ensure that limited healthcare resources are used wisely but with consideration for the individual and collective needs of patients. Treatments (including frequency of treatment) must always be able to be justified on clinical grounds (see section 5.3 of this Code).
Physiotherapists should:
4.4 advise managers or funders, and patients and their whānau and families where appropriate when resources are insufficient to allow adequate care.
4.5 feel able to refuse to treat a patient if they have good reasons. The patient should be informed of the reasons, alternative options of care, and where appropriate to refer to another healthcare provider.
Commentary: Reasons for refusing treatment might include: where the physiotherapist believes the treatment requested will provide no clinical benefit; where the physiotherapist has a conflict of interest; where the patient poses a serious risk of harm to the physiotherapist, their whānau, family, or their employees; or is under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.
4.6 advocate to reduce health disparities and inequalities, and improve access to services
Commentary: Occasionally policy or changes to policy such as transport and health service may negatively impact on the health and wellbeing of particular groups of patients. Where such disparities are identified physiotherapists may choose to take an advocacy role to speak for those patients affected by such policy. Any physiotherapist who takes on an advocacy role in their professional capacity should remember that they represent the profession and should carry out such advocacy within their scope of practice. Physiotherapists who take on such a role should seek guidance from their professional organisation.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 4; 2.1C; 7.1E; 7.2E.
Physiotherapy Standards (2018): Cultural competence standard
4. Physiotherapists treat people fairly
Physiotherapists must:
4.1 not discriminate or facilitate or enable ondiscrimination based on race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, political affiliation, economic, social or health status or any other legally prohibited grounds of discrimination.
4.2 not bully or harass or facilitate or enable bullying or harassment in a workplace or workplace related setting.
4.24.3 use a coherent, robust and transparent rationale when allocating resources, taking into account the resource environment.
Commentary: As responsible stewards of healthcare resources When a physiotherapist is deciding which patientkiritakis should get access to resources before others, it is important for physiotherapists, within their role and capacity, to use a rationale that is reasonable and acceptable when making decisions around allocation of resources including kiritaki care and training for staff. For example, prioritising one person over another on the basis of personal friendship or because one person is considered to be a ‘better’ person is not acceptable.
4.3 be responsible stewards of healthcare resources
Commentary: Within the level of their role and capacity, physiotherapists need to ensure that limited healthcare resources are used wisely but with consideration for the individual and collective needs of patientkiritakis. Treatments (including frequency of treatment) must always be able to be justified on clinical grounds (see section 5.3 of this Code).
4.34.4 Only refuse to treat a patientkiritaki if they have soundgood reasons. The patientkiritaki should be informed of the reasons, alternative options of care, and where appropriate to refer to another healthcare provider.
Commentary: Reasons for refusing treatment might include: where the physiotherapist feels unsafe, where the physiotherapist believes the treatment requested will provide no clinical benefit; where the physiotherapist has a conflict of interest; where the physiotherapist feels they cannot provide safe care; where the kiritaki poses or has posed a risk of harm to the physiotherapist, their whānau, family, or their employees; or if they are under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.
Physiotherapists should:
4.44.5 advise managers or funders, and patientkiritaki and their whānau and families where appropriate when the resource environments are insufficient to allow adequate care.
Commentary: Reasons for refusing treatment might include: where the physiotherapist believes the treatment requested will provide no clinical benefit; where the physiotherapist has a conflict of interest; where the patientkiritaki poseshas a serious risk of harm to the physiotherapist, their whānau, family, or their employees; or is under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.
4.54.6 advocate to promote health equityreduce health disparities and inequalities, and improve access to services.
Commentary: Occasionally policy or changes to policy such as transport and health service may negatively impact on the health and wellbeing of particular kiritaki groups . Where such disparities are identified, physiotherapists may choose to take an advocacy role to speak for those patientkiritaki affected by such policy. Any physiotherapist who takes on an advocacy role in their professional capacity should remember that they represent the profession and should carry out such advocacy within their scope of practice. Physiotherapists who take on such a role should seek guidance from their professional organisation.
4.7 identify, and work to reduce organisational, institutional and individual discriminatory behaviour in the physiotherapy context.
Amendments to Principle 4:
4.1 Added ‘facilitate or enable discrimination on’
4.2 *New* addresses bullying
4.3 Added ‘taking into account the resource environment’
NOTE 4.3 removed as usually out of control of the physiotherapist
4.4 now 4.5- Added ‘resource environments’
4.5 Changed from should to ‘must’ (now 4.4). Wording amended to ‘only refuse’ and ‘good’ reason to ‘sound’ reason‐ commentary updated
4.6 amended to a positive statement
4.7 *New*
General feedback – 97% of respondents believe Principle 4 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
5. Physiotherapists practise in a safe, competent and accountable manner
5. Physiotherapists practise in a safe, competent and accountable manner
Physiotherapists must:
5.1 base physiotherapy interventions on the best available evidence.
5.2 make sound professional judgements within their scope of practice and level of expertise and be accountable for their professional practice.
5.3 provide physiotherapy services that are clinically justifiable.
5.4. practise according to documented Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand.
5.5 incorporate safety and risk management strategies within physiotherapy practice to ensure the safety of patient and staff.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Right 4; Health and Safety at Work Act 2015.
Relevant resources: Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015) 4.4, 4.5
5.6 provide appropriate direction and support for less experienced colleagues and support‐ staff.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015) 6.2, 7.2
Physiotherapy New Zealand (2012) Guideline for the use of physiotherapy assistants/support workers
5.7 keep comprehensive, up‐to‐date, accurate, and legible patient records
Commentary: Making sure that patient records are comprehensive, up‐to‐date, accurate and legible is of utmost importance. In particular:
- Patient records are a vital source of communication between health professionals providing care to a patient. The records must, therefore, provide clear details on investigations and diagnosis using recognised terminology, information provided by and given to the patient, consent given by the patient, and treatment carried out.
- Physiotherapists should be mindful that treatment records may be accessed by the patient and so all entries must be respectful.
- Patient records may be viewed by others (such as ACC or the Health and Disability Commissioner) and so must contain sufficient detail to enable others to understand the care provided.
Relevant law: Health Information Privacy Code 2020, Rules 3, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11; Privacy Act 2020.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Physiotherapy health records standard
5.8 have a full understanding of and comply with the laws and regulations that govern and impact on the practice of physiotherapy in New Zealand.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand 2015. 5; 1.2; 2.1F; 2.2; 3.2B; 4.3; 4.4; 4.5; 6; 7.2,
5. Physiotherapists practise in a safe, competent and accountable manner.
Physiotherapists must:
5.1 base physiotherapy interventions on the best available evidence.
5.2 make sound professional judgements within their scope of practice and level of expertise and be accountable for their professional practice.
5.3 provide physiotherapy services that are clinically justifiable and appropriate.
5.4 practice according to the currentdocumented Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand.
5.5 incorporate safety and risk management strategies within physiotherapy practice to ensure the safety of patientkiritaki, colleagues and staff.
5.6 provide appropriate direction and support for less experienced colleagues and support staff.
Commentary: Physiotherapists have responsibilities to those they work with and lead, including those new to physiotherapy practice in Aotearoa New Zealand and Allied Health assistants.
5.65.7 keep comprehensive, up‐to‐date, accurate, accessible and comprehensiblelegible patientkiritaki records.
Commentary: Making sure that patientkiritaki health records are comprehensive, up‐to‐date, accurate and legible is of utmost importance. In particular:
- PatientKiritaki Hhealth records are a vital source of communication between health professionals providing care to kiritakia
patientkiritaki. The records must, therefore, provide clear details on investigations and diagnosis using recognised terminology, information provided by and given to thepatientkiritaki, consent given by kiritakithepatientkiritaki, and treatment carried out. - Physiotherapists should be mindful that treatment records may be accessed by kiritaki the
patientkiritaki and so all entries must be respectful. PatientKiritaki records may be viewed by others (such as the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) or the Health and Disability Commissioner) and so must contain sufficient detail to enable others to understand the care provided.
5.75.8 have a full have an appropriate level of understanding of and comply with the laws and regulations that govern and impact on the practisce of physiotherapy in Aotearoa New Zealand.
5.9 not undermine kiritaki safety, when teaching physiotherapy skills to others.
Commentary: There are times when it may be appropriate to teach physiotherapy skills to others including whanau of kiritaki. Physiotherapists must consider the potential harms that could eventuate from teaching physiotherapy skills to people who do not have the requisite knowledge or skill base.
Physiotherapists teaching undergraduate or postgraduate physiotherapy students must also ensure that kiritaki safety is not jeopardised, by maintaining appropriate supervision.
Amendments to Principle 5:
5.1 No changes
5.2 No changes
5.3 Amended from ‘clinically justifiable’ to ‘justifiable and appropriate’
5.4 Amended from ‘documented’ to, ‘current’.
5.5 ‘Colleagues’ added
5.6 ‘less experienced’ and ‘support’ removed to include all staff and physiotherapists.
5.7 ‘legible’ replaced with ‘accessible’ to reflect not all records are written.
5.8 Amendment of ‘full understanding’ to ‘have an appropriate understanding’
5.9 *New* moved from Principle 10
General feedback – 98% of respondents believe Principle 5 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
6. Physiotherapists act with integrity in all professional activities
6. Physiotherapists act with integrity in all professional activities
Physiotherapists must:
6.1 provide truthful, accurate and relevant information, and must not knowingly make misleading representations to patients and those legally entitled or authorised to receive information.
6.2 fully disclose any interests, including financial interests, held in products and services recommended to their patients.
6.3 act with honesty and integrity in all areas of professional practice (including when interacting with: funders, employers, employees, insurers).
Commentary: Physiotherapists must ensure that professional obligations and standards are not jeopardised by employment/contractual arrangements, relationships with industry, or other arrangements.
6.4 not accept gifts or enter into financial arrangements that may influence or give the appearance of influencing the physiotherapist’s professional judgement.
Commentary: When offered a gift (koha) from a patient (or their family member), or where other incentives are offered from industry or others, physiotherapists must respond in a manner appropriate to the context, and the intent of the giver. Physiotherapists must take care not to allow any gift (koha) or incentive to influence their clinical decision‐making, compromise the standard of care provided to any patients, or affect their cooperation with other healthcare providers. The physiotherapist must not encourage a patient to give, lend or bequeath money or gifts (koha) that will benefit a physiotherapist directly or indirectly.
6.5 be alert to potential or apparent conflicts of interests and take appropriate steps to declare and minimise them.
Commentary: Physiotherapists may find themselves in a conflict of interest position where their obligations to the patient conflict with their financial, professional or personal interests. In such situations, the physiotherapist must declare their conflict, and take steps to avoid or minimise the conflict.
Relevant law: Rights 4(2) & (5), 5 & 6 Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996.
6.6 be open and honest when something has gone wrong with the provision of care, treatment or other services.
Commentary: Seek timely advice from experienced colleagues. Inform the patient or, where appropriate, their carers, when something has gone wrong. Acknowledge that something has gone wrong, apologise and take action to put matters right if possible. Provide a prompt explanation of what has happened and why, including any likely effects.
Relevant law: Health and Disability Services (General) Standard NZS 8134.0:2008.
Relevant resources: The Health and Disability Commissioner’s ‘Guidance on open disclosure policies’.
ACC relevant document: Treatment injury document … Part 2 S32 of the ACC act
6.7 support patients and carers who want to raise concerns about the care, treatment or other services they have received.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Rights 8 and 10.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy Board website – Register a complaint or a concern
Health Quality and Safety Commission New Zealand –
New Zealand Health and Disability Services – National Reportable Events Policy 2012,
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand 2015. 6; 1.1I; 1.3A; 2.2; 3.3; 4.4; 5.1
Physiotherapy New Zealand (2016) Patient Adverse Reaction Reporting Form
6. Physiotherapists act with integrity in all professional activities.
Physiotherapists must:
6.1 provide truthful, accurate and relevant information, and must not knowingly make misleading representations to patientkiritaki. and those legally entitled or authorised to receive information.
6.2 fully disclose any interests, including financial interests, held in products and services recommended to their patientkiritaki.
6.3 act with honesty and integrity in all areas of professional practice (including when interacting with funders, employers, employees, insurers).
6.4 ensure that their professional obligations and standards are not jeopardised by employment or contractual arrangements, relationships with industry, or other arrangements.
6.46.5 consider and only accept gifts, and/or koha and/or incentives that do not influence not accept gifts or enter into financial arrangements that may influence or give the appearance of influencing the physiotherapist’s professional judgement.
Commentary: When offered a gift and/or (koha) from a patientkiritaki (or their family member), or where other incentives are offered from industry or others, physiotherapists must respond in a manner appropriate to the context, and the intent of the giver. Physiotherapists must take care not to allow any gift, (koha and/or) or incentive to influence their clinical decision‐making, compromise the standard of care provided to any patientkiritaki, or affect their cooperation with other healthcare providers. The physiotherapist must not encourage a patientkiritaki to give, lend or bequeath money or gifts and/or (koha) that will benefit a physiotherapist directly or indirectly. Physiotherapists are advised to keep a register of any gifts, and/or koha and/or incentives received.
6.56.6 be alert to potential or apparent conflicts of interests, (including financial arrangements) and take appropriate steps to declare and manage minimise them.
Commentary: Physiotherapists may find themselves in a conflict‐of‐interest position where their obligations to the patientkiritaki conflict with their financial, professional or personal interests. In such situations, the physiotherapist must declare their conflict, and take steps to avoid or minimise the conflict.
6.66.7 be open and honest when something has gone wrong with the provision of care, treatment or other services.
Commentary: Seek timely advice from experienced colleagues. Inform the patientkiritaki or, where appropriate, their carers, when something has gone wrong. Acknowledge that something has gone wrong, apologise and take action to put matters right if possible. Provide a prompt explanation of what has happened and why, including any likely effects and document this. An analysis should be undertaken to help prevent reoccurrence of a similar incident.
6.76.8 provide information about the avenues for raising concerns or complaints support patientkiritakii and carers who want to raise concerns about the care, treatment or other services they have received.
Amendments to Principle 6:
6.1 Statement amended
6.2 ‘Fully’ removed‐ unnecessary wording.
6.3 No changes
6.4 New statement added to make it clear professional requirements cannot be ignored or overwritten by employment or other contractual arrangements.
6.5 Consider and only’ replaces ‘not accept’
6.6 Addition of ‘including financial arrangements’
6.7 Addition of link to ‘adverse event reporting standard’
6.8 Reword to make it clear physiotherapists must provide information but are not required to support
General feedback – 97% of respondents believe Principle 6 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
7. Physiotherapists strive for excellence in the practice of physiotherapy
7. Physiotherapists strive for excellence in the practice of physiotherapy
Physiotherapists must:
7.1 commit to ongoing learning and the maintenance and development of clinical and professional skills.
Commentary: As part of the recertification programme, physiotherapists are required to engage in continuing professional development including peer review.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy Board recertification programme.
Physiotherapy New Zealand Continuing Professional Development resources (Members only)
7.2 ensure research in which they are involved has approval from an appropriately accredited research ethics committee where required.
Commentary: It is imperative that research carried out by physiotherapists meet certain standards. Research ethics committees that are accredited by the Health Research Council will require all research to meet nationally agreed standards.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996, Right 9, ‘Ethical Guidelines for Intervention Studies, (2009)’, ‘Ethical Guidelines for Observational Studies,’ (2006), New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000 s 16, Accident Compensation Act 2001 s 32.
7.3 declare to research participants and proposed publishers where research funding, support or equipment have been received from industry or any other person or organisation
7.4 ensure that financial remuneration for participating as a research investigator is commensurate with the work performed.
Commentary: Like all professionals, physiotherapists have the right to fair recompense for the use of their skills and experience. However, the motive of profit must not be permitted to influence clinical judgement. Payment in excess of work performed may cause the physiotherapist to overlook the health and wellbeing of the research participant and recruit patients inappropriately for monetary gain.
Physiotherapists should:
7.5 commit to the formal evaluation and review of innovative therapies to ensure the safety of patients and a sound evidence base for treatment. Research findings should be shared within the scientific literature.
Commentary: Physiotherapists regularly develop innovative therapies to respond to particular patient needs. Physiotherapists who do this have a responsibility to carry out research on this new treatment to ensure patient safety and to ensure that new treatments are not adopted as accepted treatment without an evidence base.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996 Rights 7(6) & 9.
Relevant resource: Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 7&4, 7.1E, 7.2.
7. Physiotherapists strive for continual improvement excellence in the practice of physiotherapy.
Physiotherapists must:
7.1 undertake commit ongoingcontinual learning and the maintenance and development of contemporary physiotherapy clinical and professional skills and knowledge.
Commentary: As part of the recertification programme, physiotherapists are required to engage in continuing professional development including peer review.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy Board recertification programme.
Physiotherapy New Zealand Continuing Professional Development resources (Members only)
7.2 ensure research in which they are involved has appropriate ethics approval from an appropriately accredited research ethics committee where required.
Commentary: It is imperative that research carried out by physiotherapists meet certain standards. Research ethics committees that are accredited by the Health Research Council will require all research to meet nationally agreed standards.
7.3 declare to research participants and proposed publishers where research funding, support or equipment have been received from industry or any other person or organisation.
7.4 ensure that any remuneration for participating as a research investigator does not influence clinical judgment or commitment to kiritaki welfare. ensure that financial remuneration for participating as a research investigator is commensurate with the work performed.
Commentary: Like all professionals, physiotherapists have the right to fair recompense for the use of their skills and experience. However, the motive of profit must not be permitted to influence clinical judgement. Payment in excess of work performed may cause the physiotherapist to overlook the health and wellbeing of the research participant and recruit patientkiritakis inappropriately for monetary gain.
Physiotherapists should:
7.5 commit to the formal evaluation and review of innovative therapies to ensure the safety of patientkiritakis and a sound evidence base for treatment. Research findings should be shared within the scientific literature.
7.5 when developing innovative approachestherapies, ensure that they are formally evaluated and reviewed for the safety of kiritaki.
Commentary: Physiotherapists regularly develop innovative approaches, including therapies, to respond to particular patientkiritaki needs. Physiotherapists who do this have a responsibility to carry out research on this new treatment to ensure patientkiritaki safety and to ensure that new treatments are not adopted as accepted treatment without an evidence base.
Amendments to Principle 7:
7.1 Reworded to reflect lifelong ongoing learning and the changing landscape of physiotherapy
7.2 Amended to ‘appropriate’ ethics approval’ from ‘appropriately accredited research ethics committee where required’
7.3 No changes
7.4 Amendment of statement to ‘Ensure that any remuneration for participating as a research investigator does not influence clinical judgment or our commitment to kiritaki welfare’, to highlight the requirement for kiritaki safety
7.5 Amendment of statement to ‘when developing innovative approaches, ensure that they are formally evaluated and reviewed for the safety of patientkiritaki.
General feedback – 98% of respondents believe Principle 7 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
8. Physiotherapists communicate effectively and cooperate with colleagues, other health professionals and agencies, for the benefit of their patient and the wider community.
8. Physiotherapists communicate effectively and cooperate with colleagues, other health professionals and agencies, for the benefit of their patients and the wider community.
Physiotherapists must:
8.1 engage in effective communication and cooperate with colleagues, other health professionals and agencies to achieve optimal outcomes for the patient.
8.2 refer patients in a timely fashion when their needs fall outside the physiotherapist’s scope of practice or skill level.
8.3 collaborate with other service providers for the benefit of the patient, keeping referring colleagues informed of the outcomes of assessment and treatment.
8.4 behave respectfully in communication to, and about colleagues or other health professionals and agencies at all times (including when using electronic communication and social media).
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996 Right 4.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 1.1G; 2.2E; 3.2C; 5.2.
Physiotherapy Standards (2018): Internet and electronic communication standard, Telehealth standard.
8. Physiotherapists communicate effectively and cooperate collaborate with colleagues, other health professionals and agencies, for the benefit of their patientkiritaki and the wider community.
Physiotherapists must:
8.1 engage in effective communication and collaborate cooperate with colleagues, other health professionals and agencies to achieve optimal outcomes for the patientkiritaki.
8.2 refer patientkiritaki in a timely fashion when their needs fall outside the physiotherapist’s scope of practice or skill level.
8.3 collaborate with other service providers for the benefit of the patientkiritaki, keeping referring colleagues informed of the outcomes of assessment and treatment.
8.4 behave respectfully in all media and communication to, and about kiritaki colleagues or other health professionals and agencies (including when using electronic communication. and social media).
Amendments to Principle 8:
8 ‘cooperate’ updated to ‘collaborate’
8.1 ‘cooperate’ updated to ‘collaborate’
8.2 No changes
8.3 No changes
8.4 ‘all media’ added
General feedback – 99% of respondents believe Principle 8 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
9. Physiotherapists take responsibility for maintaining their own health and wellbeing
9. Physiotherapists take responsibility for maintaining their own health and wellbeing.
Physiotherapists must:
9.1 refrain from practising while impaired by alcohol or drugs, or when physical, mental or emotional ill health may impair performance.
9.2 engage in activities that encourage self‐awareness and reflective practice.
Commentary: These activities may include reflective writing, reflective group work, professional supervision or mentoring, or individual forms of reflection.
Relevant Resources:
Physiotherapy New Zealand Continuing Professional Development resources (Members only)
Physiotherapists should:
9.3 recognise when fatigue, stress, physical or mental illness or any other condition may affect their professional practice, and seek appropriate professional support.
Commentary: Some life events including marriage difficulties, bereavement, loneliness, substance abuse, financial difficulties or other forms of stress may make physiotherapists more vulnerable, and at these times the quality of clinical practice may suffer, and professional standards may slip. It is important that physiotherapists are self‐aware and engage in reflective practice activities and seek guidance and support.
9.4 seek appropriate support when practising in areas where pain, suffering, grief, and loss are commonplace.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy practice thresholds Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 9; 2.3; 4.1B&D; 4.2D
Physiotherapy New Zealand (2016): Professional, supportive and evaluative relationship resources (members only)
9. Physiotherapists take responsibility for maintaining their own health and wellbeing.
Physiotherapists must:
9.1 not refrain from practiseing while their judgment or skill may be affected by of impaired byany alcohol, or drugs, or psychoactive substances.
or when physical, mental or emotional ill health may impair performance.
9.2 engage in activities that encourage self‐awareness and reflective practice.
Commentary: These activities may include reflective writing, reflective group work, professional supervision or mentoring, or individual forms of reflection.
Relevant Resources:
Physiotherapy New Zealand Continuing Professional Development resources (Members only)
Physiotherapists should:
9.3 recognise when fatigue, stress, physical or mental illness or any other condition may affect their professional practice, and take appropriate steps.seek appropriate professional support.
Commentary: Some life events including marriage difficulties, bereavement, loneliness, substance abuse, financial difficulties or other forms of stress may make physiotherapists more vulnerable, and at these times the quality of clinical practice may suffer, and professional standards may slip. It is important that physiotherapists are self‐aware and engage in reflective practice activities and seek guidance and professional support.
9.4 Reflect on the need forseek appropriate support when practising in challenging areas of practice. where pain, suffering, grief, and loss are commonplace.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy New Zealand Continuing Professional Development resources (Members only)
Amendments to Principle 9:
9.1 rewording and removal of ‘or when physical, mental or emotional ill health may impair performance’.
9.2 no change
9.3 addition of ‘and take appropriate steps’ to create and action rather than just recognise
9.4 Addition of ‘reflect on the need’ and widened to include all challenging areas of practice
General feedback – 97% of respondents believe Principle 9 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
10 Physiotherapists accept responsibility for upholding the integrity of the profession
10. Physiotherapists accept responsibility for upholding the integrity of the profession
Physiotherapists must:
10.1 raise concerns about issues, wrongdoings or risks you may have witnessed, observed or been made aware of in the practice setting that could endanger a patient or others.
Commentary:
- Reflect and consider the strength and credibility of the evidence related to the situation.
- Raise your concerns with colleagues or other members of the team if they are contributing to your concerns.
- If you are unsure, seek advice from a senior colleague or professional organisation.
- Formally raise your concerns with your manager or a senior person within your employment situation.
- Escalate your concerns to a higher level within your employing organisations if the issue is not resolved.
- If your efforts to resolve the situation within the workplace continue to be unsatisfactory, escalate your concerns to another appropriate body, for example, the Physiotherapy Board, Ministry of Health, Health and Disability Commissioner, or other health professional regulatory authority.
- Under section 34 Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (HPCAA), you may notify the relevant health regulatory authority if you believe that a health practitioner (a physiotherapist or other health practitioner) may pose a risk of harm to the public by practising below the required standard of competence.
10.2 bring unsafe or unethical behaviour by another physiotherapist or other health professional to the attention of the appropriate authority.
Commentary:
- Section 45 HPCAA provides that: If a physiotherapist has reason to believe that another health practitioner (another physiotherapist or other health practitioner) is unable to perform the functions required for the practice of his or her profession because of some mental or physical condition, the physiotherapist must promptly give the Registrar of the authority with which the health practitioner is registered written notice of all the circumstances.
- Section 34 HPCAA provides that: If a physiotherapist has reason to believe that another health practitioner (another physiotherapist or other health practitioner) may pose a risk of harm to the public by practising below the required standard of competence, the physiotherapist may give the Registrar of the health practitioner’s registration authority written notice of the belief and the reasons on which that belief is based. A physiotherapist who has acted in good faith would be protected from civil or disciplinary proceedings.
- Section 34 HPCAA provides that: Whenever a physiotherapist resigns or is dismissed from his or her employment for reasons relating to competence, the person who employed the physiotherapist immediately before that resignation or dismissal must promptly give the Physiotherapy Board’s Registrar written notice of the reasons for that resignation or dismissal.
10.3 take particular care to uphold the values within this Code when using electronic communication and social networking sites in a professional or personal capacity.
Relevant law: Privacy Act 2020, Health Information Privacy Code 2020.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Internet and electronic communication standard.
Physiotherapy New Zealand (2013) Social Media e‑book for Physiotherapists (Members only).
10.4 not undermine patient safety, or the quality and professional standing of physiotherapy when teaching physiotherapy skills to others.
Commentary: There are times when it may be appropriate to teach physiotherapy skills to others (for example, teaching chest physiotherapy techniques to the parents of a child with Cystic Fibrosis to improve the child’s quality of life). However, the physiotherapist must consider the potential harms that could eventuate from teaching physiotherapy skills to people who do not have the requisite knowledge or skill base. The physiotherapist must also consider how their actions may undermine the quality of care and the standing of the physiotherapy profession.
Physiotherapists teaching undergraduate or postgraduate physiotherapy students must also ensure that patient safety is not jeopardised, by maintaining appropriate supervision.
Relevant law: Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights 1996 Rights 4 and 9.
10.5 when engaged in advertising or promotion:
- Claim only those titles and qualifications to which they are entitled and ensure that any perceived or actual misperceptions about titles and qualifications are avoided and corrected.
- Must not use any advertising methods and/or material that bring the profession into disrepute.
- Not engage in any conduct that is misleading as to the nature, characteristics, effectiveness, and/or suitability of any product, and/or service.
Relevant law: HPCAA section 7; Fair Trading Act 1986; Consumer Guarantees Act 1993; Advertising Standards Authority Advertising Codes (including the Therapeutic Products Advertising Code, Therapeutic Services Advertising Code, and Advertising Code of Ethics).
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Advertising standard.
Physiotherapy New Zealand Position Statement (2014): Advertising as a Physiotherapist
Physiotherapists should:
10.6 willingly support the education of physiotherapy students and less experienced colleagues.
Commentary: Teaching, supervising and mentoring students and those less experienced is of benefit to future patients, the individual receiving guidance, and the profession. It also adds value to the supervisor’s practice through engagement with the person being supervised and their learning needs.
Relevant resource: Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 6.1, 6.2.
10.7 avoid treating whānau, family members and others close to you.
Commentary: Providing treatment for whānau, close family members does not constitute good clinical practice. The potential problems associated with caring for those close to you include the possibility that the physiotherapist lacks objectivity and the presence of power dynamics that may make it difficult for the patient.
Some exceptions exist, including: in emergency situations where the patient will suffer further harm if care is not provided; or in geographically remote settings where no other suitably qualified provider is available. If funding in these situations is to be sought from a third party, then care must be taken to meet particular criteria regarding verification, documentation and care plans.
Relevant resources:
Physiotherapy standard (2018): Treatment of whānau, family and others close to you standard.
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 10; 2.1C&J; 2.2A; 2.3B; 3.1B; 4.4A; 6.2.
Useful references
Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015).
Physiotherapy Standards (2018).
‘WCPT Declaration of Principle on Ethical Principles’. World Confederation for Physical Therapy: 2011.
10. Physiotherapists accept responsibility for upholding the integrity of the profession.
Physiotherapists must:
10.1 report to the appropriate authority raise concerns about any matterissues, wrongdoings or risks you theymay have witnessed, observed or been made aware of in the practice setting that could endanger a patientkiritaki or others.
Commentary:
- Reflect and consider the strength and credibility of the evidence related to the situation.
- Raise
yourany concerns with colleagues or other members of the team if they are contributing to those concerns. - If they
youare unsure, seek advice from a senior colleague or professional organisation. - Formally raise the concerns with their manager or a senior person within their employment situation.
- Escalate
yourany concerns to a higher level withinyouremploying organisations if the issue is not resolved. - If
yourefforts to resolve the situation within the workplace continue to be unsatisfactory, escalateyourconcerns to another appropriate body, for example, the Physiotherapy Board, Ministry of Health, the Health and Disability Commissioner, or other health professional regulatory authority. - Under section 34 Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (HPCAA), you may notify the relevant health regulatory authority if you believe that a health practitioner (a physiotherapist or other health practitioner) may pose a risk of harm to the public by practising below the required standard of competence.
10.2 bring unsafe or unethical behaviour by another physiotherapist or other health professional to the attention of the appropriate authority.
Commentary:
- Section 45 HPCAA provides that: If a physiotherapist has reason to believe that another health practitioner (another physiotherapist or other health practitioner) is unable to perform the functions required for the practice of his or her profession because of some mental or physical condition, the physiotherapist must promptly give the Registrar of the authority with which the health practitioner is registered written notice of all the circumstances.
- Section 34 HPCAA provides that: If a physiotherapist has reason to believe that another health practitioner (another physiotherapist or other health practitioner) may pose a risk of harm to the public by practising below the required standard of competence, the physiotherapist may give the Registrar of the health practitioner’s registration authority written notice of the belief and the reasons on which that belief is based. A physiotherapist who has acted in good faith would be protected from civil or disciplinary proceedings.
- Section 34 HPCAA provides that: Whenever a physiotherapist resigns or is dismissed from his or her employment for reasons relating to competence, the person who employed the physiotherapist immediately before that resignation or dismissal must promptly give the Physiotherapy Board’s Registrar written notice of the reasons for that resignation or dismissal.
10.3 willingly support the education of physiotherapy students and less experienced colleagues.
Commentary: Teaching, supervising and mentoring students and colleagues those less experienced is of benefit to future patientkiritaki, the individual receiving guidance, and the profession. It also adds value to the supervisor’s practice through engagement with the person being supervised and their learning needs. Physiotherapists should support colleagues in their endeavors to provide care for kiritaki.
10.4 avoid treating whānau, family members and others close to you.Commentary: Providing treatment for whānau, close family members does not constitute good clinical practice. The potential problems associated with caring for those close to you include the possibility that the physiotherapist lacks objectivity and the presence of power dynamics that may make it difficult for the patientkiritaki.
Some exceptions exist, including: in emergency situations where the patientkiritaki will suffer further harm if care is not provided; or in geographically remote settings where no other suitably qualified provider is available. If funding in these situations is to be sought from a third party, then care must be taken to meet particular criteria regarding verification, documentation and care plans.
Relevant resources:Physiotherapy Standard (2018): Treatment of whānau, family and others close to you standard.Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 10; 2.1C&J; 2.2A;2.3B; 3.1B; 4.4A; 6.2.
10.5 when engaged in advertising or promotion:
Claim only those titles and qualifications to which they are entitled and ensure that any perceived or actual misperceptions about titles and qualifications are avoided and corrected.Must not use any advertising methods and/or material that bring the profession into disrepute.Not engage in any conduct that is misleading as to the nature, characteristics, effectiveness, and/or suitability of any product, and/or service.
Relevant law: HPCAA section 7; Fair Trading Act 1986; Consumer Guarantees Act 1993; Advertising Standards Authority Advertising Codes (including the Therapeutic Products Advertising Code, Therapeutic Services Advertising Code, and Advertising Code of Ethics).Relevant resources:Physiotherapy standard (2018): Advertising standard.Physiotherapy New Zealand Position Statement (2014): Advertising as a PhysiotherapistPhysiotherapists should:11.410.4 willingly support the education of physiotherapy students and less experienced colleagues.Commentary: Teaching, supervising and mentoring students and colleagues those less experienced is of benefit to future patientkiritaki, the individual receiving guidance, and the profession. It also adds value to the supervisor’s practice through engagement with the person being supervised and their learning needs. Physiotherapists should support colleagues in their endeavors to provide care for kiritaki.
Relevant resource: Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia & Aotearoa New Zealand (2015). 6.1, 6.2.
Amendments to Principle 10:
10.1 Amendment to report unsafe matters to the appropriate authority
10.2 No changes
10.3 Removed as covered in 8.4
10.4 Moved to principle 5
10.5 Removed
10.6 removal of ‘willingly’ and ‘less experienced’ to include all colleagues
10.7 Removed as this is covered in the ‘Treatment of whānau, family members and others close to you standard’
10.8 Removed as this has its own standard
General feedback – 97% of respondents believe Principle 10 is still applicable to, and appropriate for, practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
Glossary of terms
Glossary of terms
Accountability: taking responsibility for decisions made and actions taken (or not taken).
Carer: someone who assists/supports the patient
Clinical reasoning: The thought processes associated with a physiotherapist’s examination and management of a patient and is influenced by the therapist (e.g. values and beliefs, knowledge, and cognitive, interpersonal and technical skills), the patient (e.g. needs and goals, values and beliefs, individual physical, psychological, social and cultural presentation), and the environment (e.g. resources, time, funding, and any externally imposed requirements).
Competent physiotherapist: A physiotherapist who consistently integrates and applies knowledge, skills, attitudes and values in an independent, timely manner to the standard required by the Physiotherapy Board.
Competent patient: the decision‐making capacity of that patient (see decision‐making capacity)
Decision‐making capacity: The ability to make a reasoned decision.
Evidence‐based practice: EBP is the integration of clinical expertise, patient values, and the best research evidence into the decision making process for patient care.
Family: Those persons whom the patient identifies as being a family member.
Patient: The individual who has engaged with a physiotherapist. Note the consideration of when a patient is no longer determined to be a patient is not limited to the date of discharge (refer to Sexual and emotional boundaries standard). The term patient may be substituted with the term client.
Refer: to send a patient to another health practitioner
Reflective practice: The activity in which a person reflects on the process and outcomes of a situation with the aim of improving or affirming their professional practice.
Student: A physiotherapy student enrolled in an accredited physiotherapy programme, an international physiotherapy student on clinical placement in New Zealand with a signed Memorandum of Understanding between a NZ School of Physiotherapy and the student’s institution, or a postgraduate physiotherapy student under the supervision of a tertiary institution within New Zealand.
Te Ao Māori: Translates to ‘the Māori world’. Te Ao Māori includes te reo (the language and dialects), tikanga (the processes and practices), marae (the community focal point), wāhi taonga and wāhi tapu (treasures and sites of importance) and access to whānau, hapū and iwi.
Whānau: This is generally described as a collective of people connected through a common ancestor (whakapapa) or as the result of a common purpose (kaupapa).1 Whakapapa and kaupapa are not mutually exclusive. Whakapapa whānau will regularly pursue kaupapa or goals. Whereas kaupapa whānau may or may not have whakapapa connections.2 Whakapapa whānau and kaupapa whānau are social constructs and as such can be located along a continuum depending on the function and intent.
Glossary of terms
Accountability: taking responsibility for decisions made and actions taken (or not taken).
Advocacy: activity that focuses on priority issues that optimise the health outcomes for New Zealanders. Advocacy raises awareness of the issue, gives people a voice, builds evidence, creates positive change and influences decision makers. credit to Youth Advocacy.
Bullying: repeated and unreasonable behaviour directed towards a person or people that is likely to lead to physical or psychological harm. Law society definition
Carer: someone who assists/supports the patientkiritaki.
Clinical reasoning: The thought processes associated with a physiotherapist’s examination and management of a patientkiritaki and is influenced by the therapist (e.g. values and beliefs, knowledge, and cognitive, interpersonal and technical skills), the patientkiritaki (e.g. needs and goals, values and beliefs, individual physical, psychological, social and cultural presentation), and the environment (e.g. resources, time, funding, and any externally imposed requirements).
Competent physiotherapist: a physiotherapist who consistently integrates and applies knowledge, skills, attitudes and values in an independent, timely manner to the standard required by the Physiotherapy Board.
Competent patientkiritaki: the decision‐making capacity of that patientkiritaki (see decision‐making capacity).
Decision‐making capacity: the ability to make a reasoned decision.
Discrimination: when a person is treated differently and unfairly compared to others because of a personal characteristic such as your race, sex, age or a prohibited ground. Tikanga definition
Evidence‐based practice: is the integration of clinical expertise, patientkiritaki values, and the best research evidence into the decision‐making process for patientkiritaki care.
Exploit: involves any activity in which a physiotherapist takes advantage of a person situation through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats or coercion. Professional boundaries standard
Family: those persons whom the patientkiritaki identifies as being a family member.
Harassment: intimidating, threatening or degrading behaviour directed towards a person or group that is likely to have a harmful effect on the recipient; and includes repeated behaviour but may be a serious single incident. Law society definition
Kiritaki: patient/client/consumer
Kiritaki hauora: person who uses health care services
Patient: The individual who has engaged with a physiotherapist. Note the consideration of when a patient is no longer determined to be a patient is not limited to the date of discharge (refer to Sexual and emotional boundaries standard). The term patient may be substituted with the term client. includes client, kiritaki hauora, as well as others who physiotherapists engage with in their practice (regardless of the setting or location or whether the interaction is clinical or non‐clinical). This also includes members of sports teams, cultural and social groups (such as kapa haka, dance or choir) and any other group of people seeking or receiving physiotherapy services, regardless of whether or not they personally receive the physiotherapy services.
Refer: to send a patientkiritaki to another providerhealth practitioner.
Reflective practice: the activity in which a person reflects on the process and outcomes of a situation with the aim of improving or affirming their professional practice.
Student: a physiotherapy student enrolled in an accredited physiotherapy programme, an international physiotherapy student on clinical placement in Aotearoa New Zealandwith a signed Memorandum of Understanding between a NZ School of Physiotherapy and the student’s institution, or a postgraduate physiotherapy student under the supervision of a tertiary institution within.
Te Ao Māori: translates to ‘the Māori world’. Te Ao Māori includes te reo (the language and dialects), tikanga (the processes and practices), marae (the community focal point), wāhi taonga and wāhi tapu (treasures and sites of importance) and access to whānau, hapū and iwi.
Whānau: This is generally described as a collective of people connected through a common ancestor (whakapapa) or as the result of a common purpose (kaupapa). Whakapapa and kaupapa are not mutually exclusive. Whakapapa whānau will regularly pursue kaupapa or goals. Whereas kaupapa whānau may or may not have whakapapa connections. Whakapapa whānau and kaupapa whānau are social constructs and as such can be located along a continuum depending on the function and intent.